Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Assignment #5: Checks Lab



SYNOPSIS
Today, each team was given an envelope containing a series of bank checks.

A few are removed at a time, and the team attempts each time to construct a plausible scenario which involves those checks. With each subsequent removal of checks, appropriate revision of the scenario is done. Final scenarios are compared by the class. Class discussion is designed to show how human values and biases influence observation and interpretation, even in science. This is one of the few nature-of-science lessons which have a biological connection. This is also one of the few lessons that model the "historical" sciences, e.g., geology, paleontology, astronomy, forensic science, and evolutionary studies.

Please respond to the following on/before Tuesday September 4 at noon:

0. Who are the team members of your group?
1. What bits of information on the checks were valuable to your group in formulating a hypothesis?
2. What information was "useless", if any?
3. Was any information misleading? If so, what and how was it so?
4. Summarize your original hypothesis.
5. Summarize your final hypothesis.
6. Why do we say that a hypothesis is tentative?
7. How could your hypothesis become a theory?
8. Is your final hypothesis "correct? Explain.

PHSC Syllabus: The class has added their expectations



Instructors

Dr. Rosalie A. Richards, Kaolin Endowed Chair in Science & Professor of Chemistry

Office: Herty 349 (Science Education Center); Tel: (478) 445-7531; rosalie.richards@gcsu.edu

Office Hours: by appointment
Dr. Victoria Deneroff, Assistant Professor, Foundations and Secondary Education; victoria.deneroff@gcsu.edu

Course Description

This course is a survey of the physical sciences that embraces physics, chemistry, earth, and space science concepts primarily covered in Georgia’s sixth and eighth grade Performance Standards. Content and pedagogical content will be addressed. The course will cover the development of ideas in the physical sciences including Atomic Theory, Light, Heat and Energy, and Mechanics (forces and motion). A common “text” will be assigned but resources will be available through the various online materials available in this field. In addition to in-class individual and group assignments, students will be required to engage in reading activities in and outside of class time.



Course Outcomes

  • Assess own scientific knowledge in relation to expectation for being a “highly qualified” teacher
  • Resolve common physical science misconceptions 
  • Experience science inquiry learning and be able to apply elements of science inquiry teaching
  • Apply important scientific concepts addressed by Georgia’s sixth and eighth grade Georgia Performance Standards (physical, earth, and space science)
  • Develop best practice skills for learning science content
  • Develop “sense-making” skills critical for teaching
  • Make interdisciplinary connections for middle grades students whose minds are ready to integrate knowledge
  • Develop the confidence to ask/ponder physical science questions about observed phenomena

Expectations decided by the Class
No laziness or negativity
Class to on time to class, leave on time (but we won't complain if we leave early)
We expect to participate equally
We expect to leave with a basic understanding of scientific concepts

Themes
Models
Scale

Hypothesis-building

What counts as evidence?

What is the role of the possible – what is a scientific test?

Is science a human process?
What does it mean that science is tentative, ever-changing?



Required Materials
  1. Textbook: A Short History of Nearly Everything. Bill Bryson. Broadway; ISBN-10: 0307885151; ISBN-13: 978-0307885159 (Amazon.com from $1.56
  2. Textbook: Primary Science; taking the plunge. Wynn Harlen; ISBN: 0325003866 (Amazon: $13.00-$21.81)
  3. Sketchbook - for Moon Journal (about 4x6 to 5x7; need at least 50 pages; no lines): http://www.utrechtart.com/dsp_view_products.cfmclassID=1610&subclassID=161011&brandname=Utrecht is a URL for a company that sells sketchbooks. The appropriate one on this page is the 5X7” for $7.99. You may be able to find a smaller one (4 X 6” or 4 X 4”), and a better price elsewhere.
  4. Access to a scientific calculator
  5. Safety glasses or goggles
  6. A curiosity for science
  7. A positive attitude!


Attendance
Class attendance and enthusiastic participation are mandatory. Students are expected to be in class and are responsible for all material assigned and/or addressed. One 4-hour class is equivalent to 2-3 semester lectures and one laboratory period!! Prior arrangements must be scheduled BEFORE for any absence can be considered “excused”. Work missed for absences due to emergencies or sicknesses must be made-up within a week of returning to class. Any unexcused or “without prior arrangement” absence will be recorded as a zero and factor into the final grade in a number of ways.
A course grade of F will be assigned to a student who has acquired in excess of 2 occurrences of either of the following (in any combination): class absence, or not being present for the majority of a class period.



Academic Dishonesty

Simply, academic dishonesty will not be tolerated. Any violation OR attempted violation will result in an F for the course AND will be reported to the Judicial Council under the GC&SU Honor Code. The AcademicDishonesty Policy and Procedures can be found in the GC&SU Student Handbook: see
http://www.gcsu.edu/student_affairs/Student_Handbook/honor/honor.html for further details.

Academic Etiquette
Cellular phones must be turned to silent or vibrate once you enter the classroom. Class begins at the scheduled start time. Late arrival or early departure is disruptive and disrespectful to both your peers and the professors. Computers (laptop or otherwise) are to be used for note-taking and reference only. Laptop/computer use will be prohibited if use is abused by any one student.

Fire Drill
In the event of a fire signal, students will exit the building in a quick and orderly manner through the nearest hallway exit. Learn the floor plan and exits of this building. Do not use elevators. Crawl on the floor if you encounter heavy smoke. Assist disabled persons and others if possible without endangering your own life.
Assemble for a head count north of the building.

Assistance for Student Needs Related to Disability
If you have a disability as described by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, you may be eligible to receive accommodations to assist in programmatic and physical accessibility. Disability Services of the GCSU Office of Institutional Equity and Diversity can assist you in formulating a reasonable accommodation plan and in providing support in developing appropriate accommodations needed to ensure equal access to all GCSU programs and facilities. Course requirements will not be waived but accommodations may assist you in meeting the requirements. For documentation requirements and for additional information, we recommend that you contact Disability Services located in
Maxwell Student Union at 478-445-5931 or 478-445-4233.

Shared Syllabus Statement
Graduates of Georgia College’s Middle Grades Education Program will meet all standards outlined by the National Middle School Association for Initial Certification, including tools of inquiry of specific disciplines. Middle level teacher candidates will possess a depth and breadth of knowledge in content fields that are broad, multidisciplinary, and inclusive of the major areas within those fields; candidates will also use content knowledge to make interdisciplinary connections. See
http://nmsa.org/ProfessionalPreparation/NMSAStandards/tabid/374/Default.aspx for further details about
knowledge, dispositions, and performances within content fields. In light of this aim, faculty from the College of Arts & Sciences and the College of Education regularly collaborate and agree to use criteria for meeting the content preparation standard as a focal point of the courses in the Middle Grades Education Program. Our faculties examine the progress of the students, exchange and review documented performances of individual students in all courses, and reflect together upon the effectiveness of the program as a whole. In this way the faculty members show their shared responsibility for and commitment to preparing knowledgeable and effective middle grades teachers, Architects of Change.




Assessments

Assessments will take the form of group work, quizzes, presentations, exams, and other assignments.

One midterm exam and one final project will be administered. One inquiry project will be completed.
The exam will be closed book, closed notes and no study guide or review will be provided.
“Close reading” consists of taking notes on a piece of paper (folded lengthwise) about your general understanding the science from the reading, any surprising or memorable aspects from the reading, further questions or explanations the reading incites. Close reading notes will be due after every  reading assignment at the beginning of class.
Group Assignments and Labs                    100
Weekly Activities                                       300
MidTerm Exam                                          150
Moon Journal                                             100
Present to A Scientist                                 100
Science in the Media                                    50
Final Exam (Theory Team Teaching)        200
TOTAL                                                    1000

A (≥93%) B (86-93%) C (75-85%) D (62-74%) F (<62%)





Incomplete (I) Grade

A grade of incomplete “I” will be given only when the student has completed the majority of the course requirements, and a written excuse indicating a legitimate reason why the course work cannot be completed by the close of the semester is provided to the instructor and the Dean. The student must complete the required course work in the next semester on or before the date indicated by the Registrar’s Office. Failure to adhere to these guidelines will result in a grade “F” for the course.

VISTA
Scores will be available for view at http://vista.gcsu.edu. The instructor will let you know by e-mailwhen scores are available for view. Please do not request information about scores until availability is
indicated via e-mail. If a posted score is inconsistent with your score, please feel free to let me know via e-mail or in class.



Important Dates

Classes begin: August 17

Last day to add a course; last day to drop a course without fee penalty: August 19

Labor Day Holiday: September 3
Midterm Exam:
Midterm grades due: October 5
Fall Break: October 10-11
Last day to drop w/out academic penalty: October 13
National Chemistry: Week October 21-27
Thanksgiving Holidays: November 23-25
Last Day of Class: December 5
Final Exam: (5:00 pm) December 6

Science In the Media: Sign up for weekly presentations as teams


 SCIENCE IN THE MEDIA

Here's how you signed up:
Sept 25: Coomes/Rankin
Oct 2:     Madison/Alexis (illness; reschedule)
Oct 8:     Fall Break
Oct 16:   Siobhan/Tarver
Oct 23:   Maggie O'/Tynishia
Oct 30:   Maci/Haley B;  Madison/Alexis
Nov 6:     Bullard/Thomason and Starr/Boutwell
Nov 13:   Present to A Scientist (No Science in the Media)
Nov 20:  Thanksgiving
Nov 27:   Kelly/Brianna/Sara



Goal: critical reading of popular science for relevance, authority and scientific claims


Activity: We will complete and inclass/out-of-class activity to learn how to critically assess the reliability of online sources in science. It is intended to help non-science majors think more critically about the scienctific information you receive from popular sources. The activity will be handed out to you in class.

 
Activity: We will spend the first 15 minutes in class on science in the media presentations beginning on Tuesday, September 26 2012. You must sign up as teams of two. The topics should be hot topics in science news. Information and nstructions are given below.

Some information
A primary source in science is one where the authors directly participated in the research. They filled the test tubes, analyzed the data, or designed the particle accelerator, or at least supervised those who did. Many, but not all, journal articles are primary sources—particularly original research articles.


A secondary source is a source presenting and placing in context information originally reported by different authors. These include literature reviews, systematic review articles, topical monographs, specialist textbooks, handbooks, and white papers by major scientific associations. News reports are also secondary sources, but should be used with caution as they are seldom written by persons with disciplinary expertise. An appropriate secondary source is one that is published by a reputable publisher, is written by one or more experts in the field, and is peer reviewed. University presses and other publishing houses known for publishing reliable science books will document their review process. Do not confuse a scientific review (the article/document) with peer review (the activity).

A tertiary source usually summarizes a range of secondary sources. Encyclopedias, general textbooks, popular science books, and tables of values are tertiary sources.


Where can I find copies of scientific journal articles?

Most univeristy libraries often have copies of well-known scientific journals. Community libraries, and hospital libraries may have a range and older issues of these journals. Some journals also have articles available on their Web sites. Some Web sites offer the articles free of charge, but others may require you to register with the site and pay a nominal fee. You will need the citation for the article to find it either at the library or on a Web site. See the answer to the previous question for an example citation.


What does it mean if an article or journal is "peer reviewed" or "refereed" and how will I know?

Scientific journals require research articles to go through a process called "peer review." During peer review, scientific experts who were not connected to the study review the article and decide whether it was done properly and whether the findings have merit. Only studies that pass peer review get published. The Peer Review is a process ensures that the articles that are published represent the best scholarship currently available. When an article is submitted to a peer reviewed journal, the editors send it out to other scholars in the same field (the author's peers) to get their opinion on the quality of the scholarship, its relevance to the field, its appropriateness for the journal, etc. Usually, you can tell if an article is refereed or peer reviewed just by looking. A scholarly journal is visibly different from other magazines, but occasionally it can be hard to tell. So to check, you can use Galileo search index, for example, and type in the journal in which the article is published. Among other information, you should receive a report that that indicates whether the journal contains articles that are peer reviewed or not.
Publications that don't use peer review (Time, Cosmo, Vibe) just rely on the judgement of the editors whether an article is up to snuff or not. That's why you can't count on them for solid, scientific scholarship.


What does it mean when researchers say that results are "statistically significant?"


In the case of health problems, for example, many health problems occur for a variety of reasons, including chance. Therefore, researchers must determine if a health effect they are studying might have occurred in study participants as a result of chance alone. Specifically, "statistical significance" refers to a finding in a research study that is larger or smaller than would be expected by chance alone.


Statistical significance is expressed in scientific journals by a probability value (p-value). P-values are calculated using a statistical formula. In the case of health studies, these might include the number of people and health effects being studied and may be designed to answer the question, "Could a group of this many people, who all experienced a common exposure, have had this health problem in common by chance alone?" A finding is considered statistically significant if there is less than a 5% probability (p=.05 or less) that the findings resulted from chance. Conversely, if there is greater than a 5% probability (p=.06 or greater) that a finding resulted from chance, the finding is not statistically significant.


Interesting references:




Instructions
Typically, poular online science sources summarize articles. You will find an interesting popular science piece and evaluate what the online resource reports AS WELL AS the article. Each team will provide a 1-slide PowerPoint synopsis of the information that you've found to the class.







  • The slide should include the title of the article, the source, and the authors of the presented material. For example, Middle Grades teacher designs artificial eye from shrimp shells. JoAnn Previts. Science News, Septemeber 12, 2012.
  • The slide should reference the scientists/engineers, etc. and the institution, organization or agency that identifies where the scientific activity occurred. For example, Dan Bauer, senor pre-service education major at Georgia College in Milledgeville, GA.

  • Your presentation should respond to the following questions:
    • Is this research done by a single author or multiple authors?
    • Why might this be important to know?
    • What question (hypothesis) is the author trying to answer? In other words, what is the author’s argument  or position?
    • What type of evidence was presented to answer the question?
    • Can you identify any assumptions that the authors made?

    Please provide a pdf file of the article associated with the popular science resource that you are presenting. After your presentation, please remember to e-mail to me your PPT slide.

    Here is a listing of sources that claim to provide science news.
    This is a web listing is certainly not an exhaustive; you can use other sources.
    Science News (http://www.sciencenews.org)
    Nature (http://www.nature.com/)
    Physics News (http://www.physnews.com/)
    PhysOrg (http://www.physorg.com/physics-news/)
    American Chemical Society (http://www.chemistry.org)
    Science Daily (http://www.sciencedaily.com)
    Physics Today (http://www.physicstoday.org/)
    Astronomy.com (http://www.astronomy.com/)
    Popular Science (http://www.popsci.com/)
    National Geographic (Science) (http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/)
    SciCentral (http://www.scicentral.com/)
    Scientific American (http://www.scientificamerican.com/)
    Science (http://www.sciencemag.org/)
    Live Science (http://www.livescience.com/)
    Discover (http://discovermagazine.com/)
    NASA Science (http://science.nasa.gov/)
    Wired (http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/)
    National Science Teachers Association (http://www.nsta.org/)

    References
    Identifying reliable sources (natural sciences). wikipedia.com

    Assessing the reliability of online sources in science. http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/paleo/activities/33542.html

    Assignment #4: Science, Scientific, both, or neither?

    Please choose two specific examples of science from your science autobiography and respond to the following question before Tuesday September 4 at noon. Your examples should be specific and identify the activity that you were engaged in. The goal of this exercise is for us to uncover your understanding of the term science as it relates to classroom activities.

    What is science?

    Are the activities  that you identified from your science autobiography considered (or not) science?
    Do not use any other resources; we are interested in your responses/reflections.

    You are free to compare/contrast your responses to other resources after inputting your own reflections.

    Course requirements, as promised

    1. Textbook: A Short History of Nearly Everything. Bill Bryson. Broadway; ISBN-10: 0307885151; ISBN-13: 978-0307885159 (Amazon.com from $1.56
    2. Textbook: Primary Science; taking the plunge. Wynn Harlen; ISBN: 0325003866 (Amazon: $13.00-$21.81)
    3. Sketchbook - for Moon Journal (about 4x6 to 5x7; need at least 50 pages; no lines): http://www.utrechtart.com/dsp_view_products.cfmclassID=1610&subclassID=161011&brandname=Utrecht is a URL for a company that sells sketchbooks. The appropriate one on this page is the 5X7” for $7.99. You may be able to find a smaller one (4 X 6” or 4 X 4”), and a better price elsewhere.
    4. Access to a scientific calculator
    5. Safety glasses or goggles
    6. A curiosity for science
    7. A positive attitude!

    Wednesday, August 15, 2012

    Our class members and their AKAs

    Dr. Rosalie Richards
    Dr. Victoria Deneroff
    Dr. JoAnn Previts
    Tanner (Laura) Bechtel
    Madison Blitzer
    Casey (Cassandra) Boutwell
    Haley Brookshire
    Brianna Brown
    Nicole (Kathryn) Bullard
    Casey Croomes
    Alexis Farmer
    Shiobhan Fitzgerald
    Maci Foster
    Tynisha Harris
    Sarah Lamkin
    Kelly McEahern
    Maggie (Megan) O'Shea
    Missy (Melissa) Rankin
    Jill (Jillian) Starr
    Clay (Allen) Thomason

    Tuesday, August 14, 2012

    Assignment #1: Introduce yourself by Friday, August 17

    Tell us a little about yourself and what you did this summer. I will go first!

    Assignment # 2: Nature of the Atom -

    You will blog your responses to the handout, Nature of the Atom, here. Activity I responses Due August 21

    Assignement #3: Science and Scientific: due August 21

    You created your autobiography of science and identified along a time line the classes you took and your reflections of these classes. Respond to the following by August 21.

    1. Why did you respond positively or negatively to those science experiences.
    2. Were the classes science classes?
    3. What made the activities scientific?
    What is the role of evidence in science?

    Welcome to PHSC 4010

    Dear students:
    As you enter the annals of learning this fall, please note the following requirements for your Physical Sciences course, PHSC 4010/5010:
    Class blog – http://phsc4010fall2012.wordpress.com; all relevant materials will be posted here; check frequently.
    Required Materials
    1. Textbook: The Golem: what you should know about science. Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch; 2nd Edition Cambridge University Press; ISBN 052164550-6 (Amazon price: $3.98 - $19.98)
    2. Textbook: Primary Science; taking the plunge. Wynn Harlen; ISBN: 0325003866 (Amazon: $13.00-$21.81)
    3. Sketchbook - for Moon Journal (about 4x6 to 5x7; need at least 50 pages; no lines): http://www.utrechtart.com/dsp_view_products.cfmclassID=1610&subclassID=161011&brandname=Utrecht is a URL for a company that sells sketchbooks. The appropriate one on this page is the 5X7” for $7.99. You may be able to find a smaller one (4 X 6” or 4 X 4”), and a better price elsewhere.
    4. Access to a scientific calculator
    5. Safety glasses or goggles
    6. A curiosity for science
    7. A positive attitude!
    Thanks!!
    RAR